| MONTANA:
A U.S. Government Accountability Office report made
public April 2nd sharply criticized a slew of federal
and state agencies behind the Interagency Bison Management
Plan, the governing document responsible for the slaughter
of over 3,300 wild American buffalo in and around Yellowstone
National Park.
In an April 2 press release, House Natural Resources
Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV) and Rep. Maurice
Hinchey (D-NY) criticized the bison plan as "plagued
by deficiencies" and "severely limited"
in its ability to protect Yellowstone's wild bison population.
"The entire process must be reorganized and opened
up for oversight by Congress and the public," Rep.
Hinchey said. Rep. Rahall was also quoted as saying:
"It has been clear for some time now that the current
Interagency Bison Management Plan is not working."
As the GAO report notes on who is footing the bill,
the bison plan is nearly all paid for by American taxpayers
with appropriations from the U.S. Congress reaching
a high of $3,304,817 in 2006 (FY).
"Americans are looking to our representatives and
supporters in Congress to find ways to secure a future
for wild bison in Yellowstone," said Darrell Geist,
habitat coordinator for Buffalo Field Campaign. "Millions
of dollars of American taxpayer money now used to slaughter
wild bison can buy the grass that cattle now graze on."
Buffalo Field Campaign strongly opposes the Interagency
Bison Management Plan and maintains that wild bison
should be allowed to naturally and fully recover themselves
throughout their historic native range, especially on
public lands. More than 1,300 wild American bison have
been eliminated from the remaining wild population this
winter and spring under actions carried out through
the Interagency Bison Management Plan (IBMP), as well
as state and treaty hunts.
"The plan is failing to accomplish a critical objective,
which is to maintain a wild, free-ranging population
of bison," said Dan Brister, project director for
Buffalo Field Campaign. "Free-ranging bison need
to migrate, yet more than 1,300 wild bison have been
killed this year alone under the this plan for doing
just that."
Among the key findings, the GAO report found that "...
the agencies lack accountability among themselves and
to the public, and it is difficult for the public to
obtain information without attending the meetings or
contacting each individual agency."
For years, wild bison advocates across the country and
around the world have called on decision-makers involved
with the plan to put an end to the slaughter and protect
wild bison and their habitat, but their pleas have fallen
on deaf ears.
"The agencies are ignoring the public on this issue,"
said Stephany Seay, media coordinator with Buffalo Field
Campaign. "People have written thousands of emails
and letters, made thousands of phone calls, submitted
thousands of comments, attended scores of public meetings,
and have taken direct action to draw attention to this
issue and end the slaughter, but the agencies act as
if we were not even there. That is not democracy; the
people and Congress must act to restore accountability,"
she said.
The GAO report further states: "The interagency
bison management plan does not have clearly defined,
measurable objectives, and the partner agencies share
no common view of the objectives. Consequently, the
agencies have no sound basis for making decisions or
measuring the success of their efforts.... Additionally,
the agencies have not designed a monitoring program
to systematically collect data from their management
actions, nor have they set forth a coordinated research
agenda to resolve remaining critical uncertainties related
to bison and brucellosis-related issues."
"There is every indication that the agencies are
proceeding blindly with slaughtering bison without acquiring
knowledge about what they are doing," said Mike
Mease, co-founder of Buffalo Field Campaign. "It
is unthinkable that they should be allowed to continue
on this dangerous path, with Americans who are opposed
to the slaughter footing the bill."
The GAO Report also states: "In the absence of
a systematic monitoring program, the agencies have lost
opportunities to collect data that could help resolve
important uncertainties. The plan states that all captured
bison are to be tested for exposure to brucellosis,
but fewer than half of those captured since 2001 have
been tested. For example, in early winter 2006, the
agencies lost an opportunity to collect scientific data
on about 900 bison. Park Service officials captured
these bison as they attempted to leave through the park's
northern boundary. The bison were consigned to slaughter
without being tested at the capture facility because
the Park Service determined that they would not be used
for research and could not be held in the capture pens
until the spring for release back into the park."
The GAO report finds that the agencies are failing to
follow their promise to test bison destined for slaughter
- and resolve an uncertainty in their testing which,
to date, does not determine infection or the health
of bison: "According to the U.S. Geological Survey,
a published study by researchers at the Idaho National
Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (now known
as the Idaho National Laboratory) has shown that it
is possible to detect Brucella abortus DNA in blood
samples rather than antibodies to Brucella abortus and
thereby determine actual infection… Current brucellosis
tests involve determining whether a blood sample taken
from an animal contains antibodies to the brucellosis
bacterium. The presence of these antibodies indicates
that the animal has been exposed to the bacterium in
quantities sufficient to trigger antibody production
but does not necessarily mean the animal is infected
with, or ill from, the disease itself."
Eight years into a fifteen year plan, the GAO report
found that the agencies are stuck in step one, with
no timeline on how to get out of this step the most
deadly and intrusive one for migrating bison that has
led to the slaughter of over 3,300 bison since 2000:
"The agencies have no estimate regarding how long
it will take to meet the conditions for starting step
two, nor have they revised their estimated dates for
reaching step three, which was expected by winter 2005-2006."
The GAO Report goes on to say: "The plan specifically
states that it does not identify how the agencies will
measure success or failure. In fact, several agency
officials acknowledged that they had not identified
metrics or parameters for measuring how well they are
meeting the plan's stated goals."
"With no way to measure success or failure, the
agencies proceed blindly with the bison plan,"
said Geist. "Without any foresight or regard for
consequence to the genetic viability or wild integrity
of America's last wild bison population, the government
carries out this draconian mismanagement scheme at the
expense of a national treasure."
Bison, or buffalo, are a migratory species native to
vast expanses of North America and are ecologically
extinct everywhere in the United States outside of Yellowstone
National Park.
Buffalo Field Campaign is the only group working in
the field, every day, to stop the slaughter of the wild
American buffalo. Volunteers defend the buffalo and
their habitat and advocate for their lasting protection.
Buffalo Field Campaign has proposed real alternatives
to the current mismanagement of American bison that
can be viewed at http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/actnow/solutions.html.
For more information, video clips and photos visit:
http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org.
Top
of Page
|